It is due to abnormal electrical discharges in the cells of the trigeminal nerve and these may be controlled by drugs such as Tegretol and Neurontin. If drugs do not work then surgical techniques are used to damage or decompress the nerve. Such techniques involve the use of cannulae inserted into the skull or require craniotomy. These may be designed to cause permanent nerve damage and carry the risks of open surgery such as infection.
Gamma Knife offers an effective, non-invasive alternative that works even when other methods have failed. A high energy lesion is directed to hit the nerve about 5-8mm from its entry into the brain stem. The dose of radiation can be calculated to stop pain, usually without a significant loss or alteration of sensation. The success depends on the size of the dose and pain is controlled by the first treatment in over 80% of cases.
A Gamma Knife lesion at the root entry zone of the fifth nerve offers a high chance of improvement in drug resistant cases and avoids most of the morbidity of invasive surgical approaches. A multicentre study (1) showed 58% pain free, 36% improved and 6% unchanged. The risk of facial dysaesthesia is 2-4%. If the radiation dose is increased or repeated the cure rate is much higher but so is the risk of mild dysaesthesia. A recent study with a 90Gy dose gave a cure rate of 73% but a 16% incidence of dysaesthesia (2). Giving a second dose to failed cases resulted in an overall cure rate of 98% but all of those given a second dose suffered dysaesthesia (3).
An even more recent study has identified the plexus triangularis, 5-8mm from the brain stem, as a more appropriate target with a cure rate of 83% and dysaesthesia 4% (4).
Post-herpetic trigeminal neuralgia, which does not respond to other surgical treatment (except brain stem DREZ lesions), has been shown to respond to the gamma knife in 44% of cases (5). Since the overall results of Gamma Knife radiosurgery can be better than other techniques it is likely to become progressively more popular.
In general destructive lesions for the treatment of pain are to be discouraged, but it seems unreasonable to withhold the benefit of medial thalamotomy in cases of cancer pain where all else has failed. 65% of unilateral pain cases are effectively controlled in this way. Hypophysectomy is also useful in bone pain from Ca breast metastases. Both thalamotomy and anterior cingulotomy can chronic pain of non-malignant aetiology but the indications and results are not yet clarified.
REFERENCES